Linkserp Review

My Review on Linkserp

Over the last couple months I’ve been testing some new strategies and one of the greatest system I’ve ever used for link building is linkserp.  This system automatically builds backlinks for you while you work on other projects.  It works in a similar fashion to Jon Leger’s 3 Way Links.

In June I built 10 mini sites, to test this program and got them all in the top 10 for various keywords across all three main search engines - Google - Yahoo and MSN ranked in the top 10.  Even more surprising some climbed into the #1 spot on MSN and Yahoo within just a few weeks.

All in all all 10 mini sites have had several adsense clicks and I have landed 16 sales between all 10 mini sites from affiliate programs I added side by side with the adsense.  Not bad for an extra 5 minutes of work, eh?

Some of the main keywords I am targeting are also not the easiest to crack, but again they aren’t the dating niche either.  However, just shows that link building mixed with correctly optimizing your website can be a lethal combo for your opposition.

Here are some stats on how the program works.  You basically add your websites to their system (takes 5 minutes) and within 2 months you’ll have around 250 one way backlinks generated to each website you add to their system.

One way backlinks are the best kind for your website.

The membership is just $19.99 per month and allows you to put 50 web sites into their system.  Even if you only make $2 a day from 50 web sites, that’s $100 a day or $3000 a month.  So your profit would be $2980.01 per month.  I’ll take that any day of the week.

I fully believe you should be making at least $2 a day per mini site within 2 months using this program and actually believe that number is rather low…. unless you are promoting micro niches that have less than 2 searches per day.

I believe this system works well.  I have tested it out thoroughly and have been 100% satisfied.  However, If you need 20,000 back links this system is not for you.  However, if 250 back links will make a difference in your search engine ranks (most would benefit) then this is for you.

JOIN NOW or LEARN MORE ===)

 

This entry was posted in Affiliate Marketing, Internet marketing, Link Building and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Posted July 16, 2008 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Does it allow a variety of anchor text for the 250 links like 3waylinks?

  2. michaelbrown
    Posted July 16, 2008 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Dallas,

    Yes, actually it allows 5 different anchor titles.

    1st title- gets 40% weighting.
    2nd - 30% then 15% then 10% then 5% for the 5th.

    I should have included that in the post :) Thanks for pointing that out.

  3. Posted July 16, 2008 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Hi Michael,

    Just a quick note here.
    Seeing that I am now using “SubmitYourArticle”, which you mentioned in your eBook “Back Link Factory”, do you think that this new service is really required?

    I know that this service is about half price. So basically what I’m trying to find out if this new service will add anything different to what you get with “SubmitYourArticle”, seeing that they both add backlinks to our sites.

    The only difference that I can think of is that “Linkserp” is easier to use and does note require as much effort as “SubmitYourArticle”.

    Thanks for your comments.
    Khaldoun

  4. michaelbrown
    Posted July 16, 2008 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    Khaldoun,

    Honestly I would use both. I do. This way I build links from several different ways. That way in case for some reason one of those companies goes out of business, I’m not stuck - again not that they would.

    Anything extra you can do to pile links into your site is great. The beauty with using article site as well is that you can deep link.

    It’s a deadly link building combo :) So if you can afford the extra $19.99 a month I would for sure do it.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*