<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linkserp Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing and Business Growth Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelbrown</title>
		<link>http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelbrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Khaldoun,

Honestly I would use both.  I do.  This way I build links from several different ways.  That way in case for some reason one of those companies goes out of business, I&#039;m not stuck - again not that they would.

Anything extra you can do to pile links into your site is great.  The beauty with using article site as well is that you can deep link.

It&#039;s a deadly link building combo :) So if you can afford the extra $19.99 a month I would for sure do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khaldoun,</p>
<p>Honestly I would use both.  I do.  This way I build links from several different ways.  That way in case for some reason one of those companies goes out of business, I&#8217;m not stuck &#8211; again not that they would.</p>
<p>Anything extra you can do to pile links into your site is great.  The beauty with using article site as well is that you can deep link.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a deadly link building combo <img src='http://michaelsbrown.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  So if you can afford the extra $19.99 a month I would for sure do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khaldoun</title>
		<link>http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Khaldoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Just a quick note here.
Seeing that I am now using &quot;SubmitYourArticle&quot;, which you mentioned in your eBook &quot;Back Link Factory&quot;, do you think that this new service is really required?

I know that this service is about half price. So basically what I&#039;m trying to find out if this new service will add anything different to what you get with &quot;SubmitYourArticle&quot;, seeing that they both add backlinks to our sites.

The only difference that I can think of is that &quot;Linkserp&quot; is easier to use and does note require as much effort as &quot;SubmitYourArticle&quot;.

Thanks for your comments.
Khaldoun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Just a quick note here.<br />
Seeing that I am now using &#8220;SubmitYourArticle&#8221;, which you mentioned in your eBook &#8220;Back Link Factory&#8221;, do you think that this new service is really required?</p>
<p>I know that this service is about half price. So basically what I&#8217;m trying to find out if this new service will add anything different to what you get with &#8220;SubmitYourArticle&#8221;, seeing that they both add backlinks to our sites.</p>
<p>The only difference that I can think of is that &#8220;Linkserp&#8221; is easier to use and does note require as much effort as &#8220;SubmitYourArticle&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.<br />
Khaldoun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelbrown</title>
		<link>http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelbrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Dallas,

Yes, actually it allows 5 different anchor titles.

1st title- gets 40% weighting.
2nd - 30% then 15% then 10% then 5% for the 5th.

I should have included that in the post :)  Thanks for pointing that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dallas,</p>
<p>Yes, actually it allows 5 different anchor titles.</p>
<p>1st title- gets 40% weighting.<br />
2nd &#8211; 30% then 15% then 10% then 5% for the 5th.</p>
<p>I should have included that in the post <img src='http://michaelsbrown.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dallas criminal attorney</title>
		<link>http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>dallas criminal attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsbrown.com/linkserp-review/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Does it allow a variety of anchor text for the 250 links like 3waylinks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it allow a variety of anchor text for the 250 links like 3waylinks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
